This episode examines physicist Roger Penrose's extremely wild and imaginative theory for explaining the ridiculously improbable order of the Big Bang without invoking an intelligent cause. Penrose describes the tremendous problem of explaining the unlikely Big Bang as follows: In order to produce a universe resembling the one in which we live, the Creator would have to aim for an absurdly tiny volume of the phase space of possible universes – about 1/10^10^123 of the entire volume...This is an extraordinary figure. One could not possibly even write the number down in full... When Penrose speaks about the Creator, he means it metaphorically, as he doesn’t believe in God. This episode shows how Penrose’s theory - Conformal Cyclic Cosmology - attempts to explain the improbable order of the Big Bang without an intelligent Creator, and ultimately justifies why we think the argument for an intelligent cause still stands. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening 1:54 - Introduction 3:10 - Conformal Cyclic Cosmology 7:14 - The Universe Loses Track of Time…. 12:09 - Disappearance of Mass 17:49 - Hawking Radiation and Entropy Transcendence 22:23 - Evaluating Conformal Cyclic Cosmology Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595 X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god
-------- Â
28:55
Cyclic Universes and Bouncing Cosmology - S2:E15
Our universe’s initial state was incredibly unlikely, and if it were even slightly different, nothing would exist except for black holes. This episode discusses physicist Paul Steinhardt’s theory of Bouncing Cosmology which attempts to explain this unlikely beginning without requiring either an infinite varied multiverse or an intelligent cause. This theory is so wild and imaginative that we really had to struggle to come up with analogies to make it understandable to everyone. But we did. And these might just be our best analogies yet. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening 1:34 - Introduction 4:35 - Cyclic Cosmology 7:40 - Entropy Density 12:44- Bouncing Cosmology 18:21 - Changing Dark Energy 21:40 - Evaluating Bouncing Cosmology Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595 X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god
-------- Â
25:00
Cosmological Natural Selection - S2:E14
Biologist Richard Dawkins, in his book, The Blind Watchmaker, wrote the following: The theory of evolution by cumulative natural selection is the only theory we know of that is, in principle, capable of explaining the existence of organized complexity. Even if the evidence did not favour it, it would still be the best theory available. In this episode, we discuss physicist Lee Smolin’s attempt to extend natural selection from biology and apply it to the cosmos as a whole in order to explain fine tuning in physics. We start by discussing black holes and baby universes and end with what Smolin calls the meta-laws dilemma. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening 1:35 - Alternative Theories 4:00 - Biological and Cosmological Natural Selection 7:51 - The Three Premises of Cosmological Natural Selection 16:05 - Not a Genuine Multiverse 18:34 - Problems With All Three Premises 24:12 - Smolin’s False Prediction 25:53 - The Fine Tuned Meta-Law 28:54 - Summary of Problems with Cosmological Natural Selection 30:39 - The Meta-law Dilemma Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595 X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god
-------- Â
39:33
Is Multiverse Science? - S2:E13
Multiverse scientists deviate from the longstanding scientific method, grounded in predictions and observations, by positing infinitely many unobservable parallel universes to explain fine tuning. They have subtly switched to a mathematically formulated philosophical theory about an infinite multiverse to explain the fine tuning of our one ordered universe. This episode justifies why the multiverse is not science, and supports this assertion through the words of prominent scientists who attempt to defend the esteem of science from the multiverse’s corrosive effects. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening 1:34 - Evaluating the Eternal Inflation/String Theory Multiverse 3:14 - Eternal Inflation Makes No Predictions Because of its Infinities 7:45 - String Theory Makes No Predictions 13:01 - All Multiverse Theories Fail to Make Predictions 15:10 - Redefining Science 19:25 - Redefining Science Won’t Help, But It Will Hurt 25:25 - Multiverse Scientists’ Disdain Towards Philosophy 27:07 - Why it Matters if Multiverse Corrupts Science 29:50 - Multiverse is Not Science but is Bad Philosophy Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595 X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god
-------- Â
33:20
Philosophical and Scientific Methods for Multiverse - S2:E12
The scientific method has been the key to the great success of science over the past 300 years, and it’s incredibly important to distinguish it from the philosophical method. You probably learned about the scientific method in 5th grade, and might be surprised we’re doing an episode on it. But times are changing. There’s now a serious controversy in the scientific community about whether it’s time to change the definition of science to accommodate the multiverse under the banner of science. That’s a truly shocking development. In this episode, we present a clear formulation of the scientific and philosophical methods so you can judge for yourself whether the multiverse is science or philosophy. Timestamps: 0:00 - Opening 1:36 - Introduction 3:27 - The Scientific Method 7:25 - Why Following the Scientific Method is so Important 8:00 - Rejecting False Theories 11:25 - Accepting True Theories 13:35 - The Philosophical Method 18:50 - Science-Based Philosophy 21:51 - Multiverse is Science-Based Philosophy 23:48 - Multiverse is Not a Good Philosophical Theory 25:53 - Value of Good Science-Based Philosophy 27:52 - Multiverse Scientists Claim Multiverse is Science Get essay versions of all episodes in Season 1: Intelligent Cause and Season 2: Analyzing & Rejecting Multiverse Subscribe to Physics to God on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089972838595 X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/PhysicsToGod Instagram: https://instagram.com/physics_to_god
Physics to God is a guided journey through modern physics to discover God. We start from the fine tuning of the constants of nature, travel through the multiverse, and ultimately arrive at a compelling idea of God.
Australia