The Chris Hedges Report

The greatest injustices in the world are often masked in volumes of complex and incomprehensible legal language that are not accessible to the general public. The genocide of Palestinians in Gaza is one horrific example of how the world’s highest legal institutions appear to have gone through the motions of upholding international law, but in reality, are riddled with corruption and political ambition that have enabled the Zionist entity to commit ongoing war crimes and ethnic cleansing.

In his most recent book, “Gaza’s Gravediggers: An Inquiry into Corruption in High Places,” which may be the ‘capstone’ to his life’s work of documenting the settler-colonial state of Israel, Professor Norman Finkelstein lays out in detail the facts about what is occurring in Gaza versus the flawed claims made by the United Nations and international courts. Finkelstein joins Chris Hedges to discuss the “shortcomings” and “outright fraud” in what he calls “pockets of corruption in the international system” in this episode of The Chris Hedges Report.

Finkelstein does the tedious work of individually exposing the discrepancies in court reports about Palestine and demonstrating their implausibility, a difficult task when you consider that, as he states, “There’s a very big mental distance between something intuitively not sounding right and trying to prove it.” Fortunately, there are numerous reports from a variety of bodies such as the United Nations and human rights groups that have extensively documented the atrocities taking place in Gaza. Finkelstein pulls on this body of work to contrast the evidence-free claims of careerist international legal officials with the overwhelming amount of reporting conducted on Gaza by the most credible humanitarian organizations in the world.

Hedges and Finkelstein discuss the ways World Court judges and United Nations commissioners twist the facts, pick and choose their sources and manipulate events to achieve notoriety or protect their careers. They then provide an analysis of United Nations Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 2803, which created the ‘Board of Peace’ that literally gave President Trump ownership of Gaza. This and the failure of the UN Security Council to condemn the US-Israeli attack on Iran, which Finkelstein calls “the most brazen, flagrant breach of the UN Charter,” lead to the regrettable conclusion that these institutions are “no longer [are] valid arbiters of international law.”

Midterm elections in the United States are scheduled for November 3. Concerns that the elections might be canceled, coerced or subverted at any stage of the process are becoming increasingly valid as the Trump administration takes steps to possibly disenfranchise voters or otherwise control the outcome to prevent a Democratic Party majority in Congress.

Chris Hedges invited two political analysts with deep histories in Washington, Joel McCleary and Mark Medish, to this episode of The Chris Hedges Report to speak about a series of articles they published in The Spectator, titled “Dancing in the Dark,” in which they describe the wide range of tools available to the current administration to maintain power. Medish warns, “What we see is that he’s put in place a whole array of worrying mechanisms to interfere with the process and, at a minimum, to claim afterwards that the election was flawed, so the results are not valid.”

McCleary and Medish describe the Trump administration strategy as one of keeping all options open. These include preventing people from voting, intimidating voters, and even targeted challenges aimed at particular races to prevent certain members of Congress from being seated. They caution that the administration learned many lessons from their mistakes in the 2020 election, and are better prepared this time to control the narrative and to act quickly to intervene in races. As McCleary explains, “This time I think they’re preparing the public for the case that they will have to make, and the election deniers, who are now in key positions, will be part of that communication strategy.”

Another concern is the amount of executive power that Donald Trump possesses. There are old tools such as The Insurrection Act or Article II of the US Constitution that could be invoked and other new ones such as the National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, which targets anyone deemed to be anti-Christian, anti-capitalist or anti-fascist. Their warnings are a call to action, as Hedges concludes, “We’re saying that it is this serious. And I think if Trump manages to essentially shut down these elections, there’s no exit.”

In communities throughout the United States, the infrastructure required to surveil and track anyone is rapidly being constructed, from Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) systems to fusion centers to the hyperscale data centers used to store the vast amount of information being gleaned from consumer products and surveillance devices. As the public becomes more aware of the hazards of this infrastructure and the extent that the state is intruding into their lives, a broad, organic national grassroots movement has formed and has already won significant victories, which frightens the political elites and their corporate benefactors.

For this episode of The Chris Hedges Report, investigative journalist Daniel Boguslaw joins Hedges to discuss what he has discovered by poring through unpublished reports from entities such as the Department of Homeland Security, FBI and Fusion Centers. Boguslaw reveals the inner workings of a post-9/11 growing national security complex that requires the manufacturing of new threat categories under the guise of ‘terrorism’ to nourish and sustain itself. He explains that prior to 9/11, “the FBI and the national security apparatus was already on high alert, trying to look for ways to encircle American citizens exercising their right to free speech and assembly using the language and ideology of counterterrorism,” and adds that we are in a new era of unbridled attacks on free speech and state repression.

Hedges and Boguslaw begin by discussing the newest threat category, ‘anti-technology extremism,’ “a direct response to widespread protests over the building of these massive data centers and the increasing intrusion into our lives as well as their destructive power of artificial intelligence.” Then Boguslaw speaks about the long rise of fusion centers where Corporate America has partnered with local and federal law enforcement to use the “cloak of the state to give them more powers to persecute dissent.”

In this new era, there is scant oversight of the surveillance system, enabling major abuses of power by both the state and corporations. An individual or group does not have to engage in violent acts to be deemed a threat. The list of suspicious activities is long and includes those “that could easily be carried out by peaceful protesters.” Congress, where there is bipartisan support, and academia, through its field of ‘extremism research,’ are also responsible for the growing security state. As Hedges summarizes, “these institutions perpetuate themselves and so they manufacture threats in order to continue not just their existence but their expansion.”

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more ubiquitous by the day, its alleged dangers are being increasingly discussed by the dominant players of Silicon Valley, who are beginning to call publicly for a slowdown in its implementation. The greatest risk to people is not the technology itself but the military-contracting capitalists behind it such as Sam Altman and Elon Musk, who envision a technocratic future where man and machine merge in a dystopian harmony.

Harvard historian Jill Lepore joins Chris Hedges in this episode of The Chris Hedges Report to discuss her new book, “The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State,” where she delves into the forces that shaped the beliefs of the small, but powerful, group of elites from Silicon Valley who are pushing to replace liberal democracy with automated systems that they claim would create “a world of really endless abundance and no labor, where the things that are hard in our lives would be taken care of by machinery.” Lepore looks at their connections to the technocracy movement of the early twentieth century and how their early views were shaped by science fiction and comic books.

The psychopathology of these elites, Hedges states, is that they have a “disdain for not just governance, but the very systems of life itself, that which sustains life.” Hedges and Lepore discuss Hannah Arendt’s writings on totalitarianism and automation, and the rise of the desire to escape. Lepore describes, “Silicon Valley tech moguls who really do talk quite casually about severing what are for most of us the ties that make us human - our ties to one another, our ties to the planet, our ties to our communities.”

Hedges and Lepore analyze whether the artificial state is inevitable. Lepore notes that people are becoming more aware of the risks as the explosion of data center construction reveals “the massive infrastructure behind the technology we use every day, the ways we are already supporting this tech future.” Lepore cautions that tech corporations should not be allowed, as they currently are, to operate and manage this risky technology without public oversight, and that there is still time to take action and change course.