The People’s Court Podcast

First, the plaintiff paid the defendant to rent an apartment. When she went to move in, there was a no trespassing sign on the fence, and the gate was locked. The plaintiff found out the apartment was illegal, and she couldn't move in, so the plaintiff is suing for her money back. The defendant claims the plaintiff gave him money to hold the apartment, but he ran a background check and found out she was being evicted. The defendant told the plaintiff she was not welcome and alleges she tried to break into the place.

Then, the plaintiff says he and the defendant decided to mate their dogs, and they agreed he'd get three of the puppies. However, the defendant only gave him one, and the plaintiff had to pay a vet for a complicated birth. The plaintiff is suing for a vet bill, one day's pay, and the value of two puppies. The defendant insists she never agreed to give the plaintiff three puppies. The defendant says the plaintiff decided to bring the dog to the vet and that was not her decision. The defendant is countersuing for harassment.

Plus, the plaintiff bought his son a used car from the defendant, but it turned out to be a piece of junk, so he's suing. The defendant insists he agreed to look at the car himself, but he was never given the opportunity to make good on the vehicle.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff was hired to work for a toy drive at a hospital but hasn't been paid, so he' suing. The defendant insists the organization doesn't owe the plaintiff a dime, and this lawsuit is meritless.

Then, the plaintiff says the defendant, her daughter's father, owes her money for an unpaid loan she gave him after she won the lottery, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the money was a gift.

Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant's unleashed dog attacked his leashed dog, so the plaintiff is suing for vet bills. The defendant argues the plaintiff's dog isn't neutered and both of their pets sustained injuries in the attack.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says the defendant crashed into her car, so she's suing for damages. The defendant insists it's the plaintiff who backed into him.

Then, the plaintiff claims the defendant, her ex-husband, cashed in one of her insurance checks, so she's suing. The defendant argues the check was intended for him, not her.

Plus, the plaintiff went to the defendant's shop to purchase prescription glasses. However, when he went to pick them up, the lenses were there, but the frames were missing, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant says the glasses were ready for pickup, but the plaintiff refused to pay the balance due.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff and her boyfriend moved into the defendant's basement apartment. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant is withholding her security deposit and owes her for items that were damaged in a flood, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff smoked marijuana in her home, and she had to evict her. The defendant denies owing the plaintiff anything. The defendant is countersuing for damages.

Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to install a heating and air conditioning unit, but it doesn't work right, so he's suing. The defendant insists he did a great job.

Plus, the plaintiff purchased a sofa from the defendant and was told there was a built-in power recliner. However, the plaintiff claims the recliner ended up being manual, so he's suing. The defendant argues he never promised a power recliner.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, the plaintiff says she and the defendant have been dating on and off for years, but they eventually broke off the relationship. The plaintiff claims she paid for various things during their relationship, but the defendant hasn't paid her back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the items the plaintiff purchased were intended for both of them for their apartment, and he doesn't believe he owes a dime.

Then, the plaintiff was in her car with her daughter when the defendant crashed into her door. The plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff is responsible for the damages, not her.

Plus, the plaintiff rented a room from the defendant but had a bad feeling and backed out. The plaintiff put a stop payment on her deposit, but the defendant already cashed it in, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the deposit check was stolen, and she did nothing wrong.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices